Tax audit (CIT+VAT)
In today’s dynamic world of tax regulations, a tax audit, including corporate income tax (CIT) and value-added tax (VAT), is an indispensable tool for effective tax risk management. It is a process that not only identifies potential risks and irregularities, but also meticulously assesses compliance with applicable tax laws. By treating a tax audit not only as an instrument of control, but also as a strategy for optimizing the tax burden and improving the efficiency of tax processes, you will gain a competitive advantage.
Who is it for?
- Do you want to make sure that your company is compliant with CIT and VAT regulations and that your accounts are in compliance with the applicable law?
- Do you need a professional assessment of potential tax risks associated with your business?
- Are you looking to optimize your tax burden and improve the efficiency of your tax processes?
Our support scope:
- Performing a detailed tax audit covering CIT and VAT, which will give you a fresh perspective on your tax obligations.
- Identifying potential risks and irregularities in your tax returns, giving you the opportunity to correct mistakes before they become problems.
- Providing tailored advice on optimizing your tax burden and streamlining your tax processes so that your business can make more profit, regardless of complex tax laws.
Contact one of our experts on tax management
Winning the case before the Supreme Administrative Court
on tax control for 2013 and determination of tax liability. Ref. act II FSK 585/20
Winning the case before the Supreme Administrative Court
regarding the Company's CIT exemption. Ref. act II FSK 1250/22
Winning case before the Voivodeship Administrative Court
on alleged abuse of VAT law. Ref. no. III Sa/Wa 203/22
Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court, ref. no. I FSK 1816/20
The court objected to the very common approach among the tax authorities, but also often among the courts, of attributing an implicit awareness of participation in a fraud by pointing out that the evidence on the record did not show that such awareness existed. The court ordered that very precise criteria be taken into account that would make such awareness of fraud plausible.
