Support in identifying and reporting MDR
Recognizing and reporting tax schemes under the Mandatory Disclosure Rules (MDR) is not only a legally imposed requirement, but also a security issue for your business. The complex, changing nature of MDR regulations can lead to unknowing violations. Our service offers comprehensive support in identifying and reporting MDR-compliant tax schemes, protecting your company from potential sanctions.
Who is it for?
- Do you want to ensure that your company is correctly reporting all tax schemes in accordance with the MDR?
- Are you looking for expert support to minimize the risks associated with improper identification and reporting of tax schemes?
Our support scope:
- Professional identification of tax schemes subject to MDR regulations.
- Comprehensive support in the MDR reporting process, including development and submission of relevant reports.
- Advice on tax strategies to ensure continued compliance with MDR regulations.
Contact one of our experts on MDR
Winning the case before the Supreme Administrative Court
on tax control for 2013 and determination of tax liability. Ref. act II FSK 585/20
Winning the case before the Supreme Administrative Court
regarding the Company's CIT exemption. Ref. act II FSK 1250/22
Winning case before the Voivodeship Administrative Court
on alleged abuse of VAT law. Ref. no. III Sa/Wa 203/22
Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court, ref. no. I FSK 1816/20
The court objected to the very common approach among the tax authorities, but also often among the courts, of attributing an implicit awareness of participation in a fraud by pointing out that the evidence on the record did not show that such awareness existed. The court ordered that very precise criteria be taken into account that would make such awareness of fraud plausible.
Judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw (III SA/Wa 2555/20)
Judgment on abuse of rights. The court questioned the authorities' instrumental attempts to apply the concept of abuse of rights, pointing out that the conditions for abuse were not met in the evidence on the record.
Winning case before the CJEU. C-395/09
The right to deduct input tax when purchasing services from countries considered to be tax havens, Oasis East Ltd.
Winning case before the CJEU. C-395/09
The incompatibility with Community law of Polish provisions concerning the restriction of the right of entrepreneurs to deduct VAT on the purchase of passenger cars and fuel for them, Magoora Sp. z o.o.
Winning case before the CJEU. C-313/05
Excise duty levied on imported second-hand cars in connection with their first registration in Poland, Maciej Brzezinski
Most conducted and won cases when representing taxpayers before the CJEU among all Polish attorneys.
Jerzy Martini - author and co-author of Commentary on the VAT Directive (Unimex ed.)
Jerzy Martini - author, co-author and editor of Commentary to the VAT Act (publ. C.H.Beck)
Jerzy Martini - author and co-author of "VAT in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice" (publ. C.H.Beck)
Marek Wojda - co-author of Commentary on the VAT Directive (Unimex ed.) and the VAT Act (C.H.Beck ed.)
Featured in the 'Law firm on Linkedin - a practical guide' by legal marketing agency Tomczak Stanisławski.
Repeatedly recognised in the rankings of Rzeczpospolita and Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.
We teach at universities, including the School of Economics
Jerzy Martini honoured annually in the prestigious Chambers & Partners ranking, indicated as Band I (highest possible level) in the individual ranking of tax advisers in the Tax Consultants category.